Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 13, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Speaking for Prologis, warned the moratorium will cause entitlements to expire and block vested-rights projects, including one promising $400,000 for the Perris Skills Center.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 45:30 →Representing NAIOP Inland Empire, asked the council to pause the moratorium, warning stalled projects mean lost infrastructure and revenue.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 48:53 →Urged extension of the moratorium to protect residents from truck traffic and pollution and to allow community impact planning.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 52:03 →Argued the moratorium conflicts with new streamlined CUP pathways and reduced CEQA review, and asked the council to resequence its actions.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 55:07 →Supported a longer pause and urged the moratorium to also cover AI data centers.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 59:01 →Supported extension and asked that it cover AI data centers and any warehousing linked to detention uses.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:00:58 →Urged a yes vote, citing 82 million square feet of existing warehouse space and health impacts on children and seniors.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:04:31 →Asked that the Parcel Hub and regional warehouses be included in the studies and advocated eventually for a complete warehousing ban.
City Council (Regular) - Jan 13, 2026 · 1:07:20 →