O
Perris
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Fire station bid protest (Item 10.S)

Perris

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 28, 2026.

Public comments (4)

SupportiveKallen KildeaJul 28, 2026

Builders United's president rebutted Perris Construction's protest allegations point by point, arguing its bid is fully responsive and Perris gained a $365,000 advantage with an expired subcontractor DIR registration.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 28, 2026 · 55:00 →
OpposedVijay SharmaJul 28, 2026

Representing Perris Construction, argued Builders United's bid has material defects — an unlisted addendum, an expired subcontractor license, and an invalid bid bond — that would cost the city an extra $283,000.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 28, 2026 · 58:55 →
SupportiveVineer BailolJul 28, 2026

Congratulated the council and athletes and voiced Builders United's enthusiasm to build Fire Station 105.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 28, 2026 · 1:02:08 →
OpposedGreg TrouseJul 28, 2026

Also representing Perris Construction, argued its bid protest was timely and valid and asked the council to continue the item and determine Perris is the lowest responsible bidder.

City Council (Regular) - Jul 28, 2026 · 1:03:00 →